HP 23-e000ez

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 23-e000ez  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AF1
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 18:27
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 137
60% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 226
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 610
HP(103C 2AF1) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 0.9
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 223 215 220 222 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58% Above average
Read 239
Write 239
Mixed 217
SusWrite 222
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 26
88% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 146
117% 162 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Kingston 99U5428-050.A00LF 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-e000ez Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 23-e000ez

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback