OEM G41 775 ICH7 8712

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardOEM G41 775 ICH7 8712  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 23:17
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
25.5% Poor
Memory 36.7
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 57.3
26% 42.8 Pts
4-Core 86.2
8-Core 71.8
11% 79 Pts
64-Core 66.1
4% 66.1 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
Device(0000 0000) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.73 fps
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 202 87 77 76 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.3% Below average
Read 207
Write 156
Mixed 154
SusWrite 118
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 20.2
65% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 44.1
DQ Mixed 26.7
22% 31.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Adata 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41 775 ICH7 8712 Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: OEM G41 775 ICH7 8712

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback