Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results


Gaming 126% UFO	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	179% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180627
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '22 at 19:49
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 86.2 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 182 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 473 49% 393 Pts	64-Core 476 29% 476 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Zotac(19DA 1613) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5375 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	179% Outstanding	Lighting 250 Reflection 260 Parallax 280 204% 263 fps	MRender 325 Gravity 227 Splatting 171 189% 241 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB 1,495 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4H3Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 477 Write 382 Mixed 411 94% 423 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 37 135% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 212 172% 251 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 119%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 37GB free Firmware: 0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 236 94 110 37 73 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.7% Above average	Read 260 Write 241 Mixed 235 SusWrite 131 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 24.1 98% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 51.6 66% 117 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 102%
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB 17,953 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 907GB free Firmware: 0400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 167 147 176 177 152 MB/s Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.1% Average	Read 250 Write 222 Mixed 207 SusWrite 174 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 14.1 60% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 83.2 DQ Mixed 28 39% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 106%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 102GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 60 61 60 61 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 72.6 Write 52.2 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 59 43% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 4GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 26 26 27 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 24.6 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 25.5 31% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GB 1,683 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 19 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 11.7 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	15x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	11x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	4x
840 250GBSamsungBench 77%, 2,100 samples	4x

RAM
M393B5170EH1- 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 40 samples	9x
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	6x
HMT351U7CFR8A 4x4GBHynixBench 89%, 39 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16