Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive361% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 17:40
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 179
2-Core 355
112% 209 Pts
4-Core 691
8-Core 1,328
120% 1,009 Pts
64-Core 2,872
178% 2,872 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.9% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 120
Parallax 123
105% 124 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 103
Splatting 89.4
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP4000GM30013 4TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3481 3680 3458 2192 1315 1297 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2,438
Write 3,735
Mixed 2,966
SusWrite 2,570
664% 2,927 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 73.3
238% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,300
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 331
344% 599 MB/s
Poor: 246%
This bench: 361%
Great: 634%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 2TB
353GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 437 433 447 430 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 440
Mixed 432
SusWrite 438
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 47.1
155% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 181
134% 180 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$280
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 437 447 433 429 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 437
Mixed 419
SusWrite 438
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 42.4
138% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 99.7
DQ Mixed 177
127% 166 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 125 130 144 138 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 88.3
Write 52.5
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 136
69% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
109% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST12000DM0007 12TB
7TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 201 208 217 206 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 87.1
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 41.7
161% 56.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 41.9
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 147%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback