Asus H81-GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81-GAMER (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150514
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '22 at 08:08
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 93.3 2-Core 182 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 327 44% 329 Pts	64-Core 309 19% 309 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Lighting 96.2 Reflection 92.5 Parallax 96.9 78% 95.2 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 83.2 Splatting 75.1 73% 91.2 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 471 Write 410 Mixed 26 66% 302 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 13.6 4K Mixed 10.1 58% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 0.5 76% 181 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 35GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 110 99 118 118 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 95.2 Write 108 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 109 60% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 103%
ADATA HV300 1TB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 492GB free, PID a82a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 41.2 Write 41 Mixed 32 SusWrite 39.7 52% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.3 164% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 1302 PSD38G16002 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.7% Above average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17.5 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 18.5 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81-GAMER Builds (Compare 699 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-GAMER

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	184x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	93x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	76x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	28x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	20x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	41x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	19x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $493

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16