Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-HD3-A  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '22 at 10:59
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 371
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365A) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.65% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 8.5
6% 7.1 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.65%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 101 112 120 129 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 417
Write 355
Mixed 116
SusWrite 136
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 7.5
35% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 38.6
DQ Write 63.1
DQ Mixed 35.8
31% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 55%
WD WD6400AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
130GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 52 52 53 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 50.1
Write 51.2
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 51.8
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 48%
Samsung HD160JJ 152GB
38GB free
Firmware: WU100-32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 44 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 44.1
Write 46.2
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 44.5
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 34%
BMKT MemoRive 4GB
3GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.2 3.5 3.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 2
Mixed 4
SusWrite 3.4
6% 5.65 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-HD3-A Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback