Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics92.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-P  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 14 '22 at 00:43
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 149
2-Core 276
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 987
95% 785 Pts
64-Core 1,644
102% 1,644 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
Zotac(19DA 1527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.4% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 111
Parallax 113
94% 113 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 101
Splatting 95.8
90% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 355 311 298 280 268 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 488
Mixed 347
SusWrite 326
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 42.6
158% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 269
225% 326 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
60GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 211 212 205 198 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 403
Write 264
Mixed 294
SusWrite 207
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 39
154% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 136
136% 219 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 91%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
581GB free
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 441 448 451 448 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 371
Write 372
Mixed 418
SusWrite 390
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 15.7
82% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 31
75% 151 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 100%
Apricorn 250GB
132GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 38.8
Write 37.1
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 21.3
40% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 166%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 750GB
378GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 22 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 40.8
Write 41.6
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 21.5
44% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 25.1
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 30.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 50.4
79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $695
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback