Asus TP501UQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus TP501UQ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP501UQ
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 21:40
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 77
2-Core 140
58% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 216
28% 214 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Asus(1043 120E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.84% Terrible
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 11.3
11% 12 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 14
Splatting 9.4
8% 9.57 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.84%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 278 275 270 267 263 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 381
Mixed 387
SusWrite 272
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 46.8
162% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 240
209% 311 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 126%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
216GB free
Firmware: GR2OA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 69 68 68 69 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 51.9
Write 51.4
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 66.5
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB Kingston 9905624-036.A00G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.5
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP501UQ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TP501UQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback