ECT FB 24084 ONE Gaming Military Edi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemECT FB 24084 ONE Gaming Military Edi  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 19:02
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 239
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 820
77% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 191
Parallax 182
144% 183 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 183
Splatting 129
122% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
494GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 431 441 448 445 451 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 433
Mixed 421
SusWrite 436
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 50.9
179% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 348
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2174 1986 2128 1928 1385 1365 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2232
Write 2,145
Mixed 2045
SusWrite 1,828
464% 2,062 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 82.5
270% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,098
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 1,042
771% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 254%
This bench: 330%
Great: 469%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
231GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 296 298 299 296 299 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 451
Mixed 357
SusWrite 309
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 46.2
159% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 345
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MZ4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 122 123 122 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65% Good
Read 104
Write 107
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 122
65% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
110% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-138.A00G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FB 24084 ONE Gaming Military Edi Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

System: ECT FB 24084 ONE Gaming Military Edi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $744
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback