Gigabyte GA-H410M H V3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H410M H V3  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211101
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 17:10
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 217
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 659
66% 536 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.1% Above average
Lighting 61.4
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 63.4
50% 65.3 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 55
50% 62.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RevuAhn_850X1_128GB 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0530C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 276 285 242 205 287 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 512
Write 283
Mixed 274
SusWrite 252
73% 330 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 38.8
135% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 193
167% 246 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
132GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 129 127 129 130 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 11.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H410M H V3 Builds (Compare 4,736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M H V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback