Acer Aspire E3-112M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E3-112M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer R2
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '22 at 23:01
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2840
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Memory 49
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 46.8
27% 39.8 Pts
4-Core 44.9
8-Core 46.5
6% 45.7 Pts
64-Core 44.5
3% 44.5 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Acer(1025 0933) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.57 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X02c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 185 195 186 165 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.8% Average
Read 202
Write 195
Mixed 168
SusWrite 164
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 25
84% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 129
96% 127 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E3-112M Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E3-112M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback