Toshiba SATELLITE C660

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C660 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PWWAA
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110517
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '22 at 16:21
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 46.2 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 59.1 31% 47.7 Pts	4-Core 133 8-Core 127 18% 130 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 45%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66 9,402 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: GT001M SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 37 39 34 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 39.7 Write 35.1 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 32.3 23% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.4 21% 7.23 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660

CPU
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	120x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	75x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	73x

GPU
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples	174x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	168x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	53x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	43x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16