TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 81MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81MT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200708
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateMar 12 '22 at 12:34
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 43.1
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 81.8
36% 60.1 Pts
4-Core 86.2
8-Core 66.1
11% 76.1 Pts
64-Core 69.8
4% 69.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 28.6%
 Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Legend(17AA 39F5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20.36.08
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.87% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.5
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 2.87%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KR256G8 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF001E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 223 228 217 258 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
70% Good
Read 444
Write 387
Mixed 304
SusWrite 234
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 29.8
98% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 182
132% 172 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 70%
 Great: 115%
TWPHISON USB DISK 50X 32GB
29GB free, PID 6000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 198
Write 79.8
Mixed 111
146% 130 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 4.9
343% 7.13 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.4% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 24.4%
 Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 81MT Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81MT

CPU
A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 28%, 7,071 samples82x
A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2GAMDBench 28%, 3,903 samples69x
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples54x
GPU
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples82x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples69x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples52x
SSD
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples59x
HFS256G32TNH-73A0A 256GBBench 65%, 542 samples11x
MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 75%, 1,698 samples11x
RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples54x
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 16,227 samples33x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples31x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback