Besstar U820

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBesstar U820  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR CB9
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 09:54
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8279U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 229
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 474
53% 414 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Device(1E50 800C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.4% Terrible
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 14.4
11% 12.7 fps
MRender 0
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.4%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-A01 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1016 409 308 319 325 325 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,182
Write 1,091
Mixed 1,028
SusWrite 450
210% 938 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 71.7
254% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 899
DQ Write 826
DQ Mixed 847
640% 857 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4S9S8K1C-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 37
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 12.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 9.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical U820 Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar U820

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback