Lenovo 20FXA03001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20FXA03001  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FXA03001
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20161028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 09:26
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 23%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 83
2-Core 172
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 335
40% 310 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 5056) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 6.3
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 480GB-$89
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 300 298 306 299 288 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 322
Write 302
Mixed 278
SusWrite 298
68% 300 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 13.2
64% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 198
148% 194 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MD-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20FXA03001 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FXA03001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback