Asus P8B75-M LX PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LX PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 06:30
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 180
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 351
42% 323 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 0386) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 M.2 250GB SSD
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 81 81 82 84 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 228
Write 378
Mixed 276
SusWrite 134
58% 254 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 38.5
115% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 202
181% 271 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 92%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
710GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 98 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 109
Write 103
Mixed 89.6
SusWrite 98.1
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 63%
MDT MD2500AAJS-00L7A0 250GB
195GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 89.9
Write 84.4
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 85.3
59% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF Samsung M378B5773SB0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LX PLUS Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback