Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 21:49
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 155
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 488
48% 393 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 64.2
73% 62 fps
Poor: 41% Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 38 60 122 12 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 291
Write 159
Mixed 203
SusWrite 46.2
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 19.7
83% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 53
DQ Write 57.4
DQ Mixed 48.6
38% 53 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 100%
MDT MD2500AAJS-00L7A0 250GB
93GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 55 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 78.5
Write 81.2
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 55.5
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 50%
Seagate ST3250823AS 250GB-$99
31GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 42 43 43 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 12.8
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 42.1
24% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26%
Great: 37%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
78GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 76.5
Write 59.2
Mixed 77
SusWrite 95.7
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 76%
USB DISK 3.0 Pro 64GB
15GB free, PID 6023
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 29 25 25 27 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 41.3
Write 40
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 25.5
48% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.5
99% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback