HP 500-132a

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 500-132a  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime25.8 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 03:04
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 555
55% 448 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 37.6
29% 37.7 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 37
Splatting 26.2
26% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 154 3.7 62 51 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 436
Write 357
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 94.3
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
706GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 151 152 154 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 132
Write 93.6
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 152
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-132a Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP 500-132a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $151
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback