Monster TULPAR T5 V11.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V11.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V11.1
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 19:08
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 162
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 370
42% 331 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 65A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.2% Very good
Lighting 92.1
Reflection 119
Parallax 93.7
75% 102 fps
MRender 92.6
Gravity 92.9
Splatting 100
79% 95.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,755
Write 1,140
Mixed 826
273% 1,240 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 47.5
157% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 665
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 494
373% 507 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
83GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 57 58 58 58 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 60.5
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 56.6
36% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.2% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 20.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 V11.1 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V11.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback