MSI MS-AF1C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-AF1C11
MotherboardMSI MS-AF1C  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 15:17
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 625
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
MSI(1462 AF1C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.1% Average
Lighting 48.7
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 49.3
40% 51.9 fps
MRender 53.7
Gravity 51.9
Splatting 46.2
41% 50.6 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 330 322 281 299 291 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 2,026
Write 662
Mixed 679
SusWrite 315
201% 921 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 40.4
176% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 1,115
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 408
374% 598 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 184%
Great: 237%
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
69GB free
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 83 64 68 54 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 420
Write 189
Mixed 207
SusWrite 89.6
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 17
69% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 73.7
DQ Mixed 29.4
40% 74.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-AF1C Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-AF1C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback