Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardHuananzhi X58-RX3.0  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 12:50
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 975-$550
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 170
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 298
35% 271 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 17
Parallax 19.1
16% 18.4 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 15.7
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vi550 S3 SSD 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 225 230 227 228 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.6% Good
Read 245
Write 236
Mixed 225
SusWrite 221
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 31
106% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 187
140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB
1600, 1600, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58-RX3.0 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback