Sony VPCCW1WFX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSony VPCCW1WFX  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 11:46
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8800-$40
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 76.2
43% 64 Pts
4-Core 83.3
8-Core 83.1
11% 83.2 Pts
64-Core 80.2
5% 80.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,794
Write 1,206
Mixed 1,195
310% 1,398 MB/s
4K Read 76.5
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 71.1
248% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 192
146% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
21GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 62 61 61 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 55.7
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 60.4
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 71%
Ricoh SD/MMC Disk Device 16GB
10GB free
Firmware: 02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.7 6.5 8.7 6.1 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
3.7% Terrible
Read 4
Write 2.8
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 7.5
4% 5 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.5
344% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.7%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback