Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8800-$40 946 User benchmarks, average bench 38% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 78.4 35% 54.5 Pts	4-Core 78.9 8-Core 51.2 9% 65.1 Pts	64-Core 82.3 5% 82.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,807 Write 956 Mixed 1,001 276% 1,255 MB/s	4K Read 66 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 46.2 188% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 184 136% 180 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 21GB free Firmware: LCM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 59 59 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 23.4 Write 48.3 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 58.7 29% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 71% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 71%
Ricoh SD/MMC Disk Device 16GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 10GB free Firmware: 02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 8.4 8.4 8.6 8.5 8.4 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	7.51% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 10.5 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 8.2 8% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.7 366% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.51% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16