MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C80
MotherboardMSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201010
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 23:32
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,002
95% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,486
92% 1,486 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Dell(1028 C756) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.3% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 116
94% 109 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 112
Splatting 97.2
101% 129 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssdpemkf512g8 NVMe INTEL 512GB
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7004 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 733 577 545 547 546 547 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 2,388
Write 1,137
Mixed 1,164
SusWrite 583
291% 1,318 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 74.8
244% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 1120
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 930
699% 941 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 249%
Great: 257%
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$85
598GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 460 459 465 467 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 355
Mixed 385
SusWrite 457
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 36.7
150% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 268
222% 321 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 106%
Great: 121%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
499GB free
Firmware: MX4OAD30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 176 173 169 178 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 178
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 176
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
146% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
313GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 79 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 95.9
Write 99.4
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 80.9
65% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 208 205 204 206 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 200
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 206
124% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M4E3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.9
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C80) Builds (Compare 8,567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK - $253

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback