Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HM_GU603HM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HM_GU603HM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU603HM
Memory12.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211209
Uptime40.6 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 22:19
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 69.9
1-Core 167
2-Core 332
99% 190 Pts
4-Core 648
8-Core 1,086
106% 867 Pts
64-Core 1,476
91% 1,476 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 130C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.1% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 118
Parallax 109
98% 116 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 90
Splatting 81.2
80% 101 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
742GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1156 1396 1096 1186 1189 1192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,097
Write 1,303
Mixed 1,501
SusWrite 1,202
341% 1,526 MB/s
4K Read 68.5
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 87.9
291% 99.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 893
616% 779 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 280%
Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-16GRS 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 13.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HM_GU603HM Builds (Compare 1,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HM_GU603HM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback