Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '22 at 14:08
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 96.9 1-Core 146 2-Core 266 96% 170 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 673 63% 523 Pts	64-Core 1135 70% 1135 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$383 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 865F) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 173 Reflection 169 Parallax 189 141% 177 fps	MRender 184 Gravity 150 Splatting 128 123% 154 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1012 804 799 783 764 725 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	255% Outstanding	Read 2258 Write 2076 Mixed 1,526 SusWrite 815 373% 1,669 MB/s	4K Read 54.9 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 75.9 246% 85.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,106 DQ Write 592 DQ Mixed 775 596% 824 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 255% Great: 355%
BUFFALO External HDD 1.5TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1.5TB free, PID 01ba Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 42 42 42 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 37.4 Write 27.1 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 41.1 48% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 20%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB 295 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 66GB free, PID 0108 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 42 42 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 23.2 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 41.1 45% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB 52,667 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	83.1% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 23.6 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 32.3 SC Mixed 26.9 75% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 50.9 79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 139%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,519x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,331x
RTX 2080Nvidia $383Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1,133x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,364x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1,053x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	810x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	747x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	590x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	527x

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,269

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16