Diebold Nixdorf K2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDiebold Nixdorf K2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardDFI SD106
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 08:47
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 378
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Intel(8086 1912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4312
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.77 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 9.8
7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ATP SATA III mSATA 128GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMB1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 114 127 130 129 131 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.3% Poor
Read 202
Write 86.9
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 126
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 8
32% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown X4G08QA8BNPBSO-7-MD1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 10.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nixdorf K2.0 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Diebold Nixdorf K2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback