Wacom Cintiq Companion 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemWacom Cintiq Companion 2  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL CRESCENTBAY
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 04:08
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5557U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 101
2-Core 154
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 237
31% 235 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)
Device(1B0A 019B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 12
6% 7.77 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GDNU 512GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUXA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 211 214 218 217 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 305
Write 266
Mixed 307
SusWrite 213
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 29.5
91% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 288
204% 265 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 101%
SDHC Card 32GB
11GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 24 25 25 26 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1.8
Write 0.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 22.9
13% 8.43 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 33%
Samsung SSD 860 1TB
696GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 254 257 276 275 286 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 300
Write 294
Mixed 227
SusWrite 261
364% 271 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 10.6
883% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 17.9
DQ Write 35.3
DQ Mixed 20.1
1,951% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 147%
Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown A3L-1GS64F3-12E2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Cintiq Companion 2 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Wacom Cintiq Companion 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback