HP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1842
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 20:24
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 170
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 418
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M
HP(103C 1842) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 5.4
5% 6.13 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 97 100 100 99 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 437
Write 339
Mixed 353
SusWrite 137
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 23.7
88% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 207
185% 278 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 Micron 8KTF25664HZ-1G6M1 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback