Acer Veriton M4640G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M4640G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M4640G
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 08:35
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 177
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 312
40% 305 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Acer(1025 1003) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.83 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
735GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 5.5 5.7 0.7 243 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 445
Write 354
Mixed 326
SusWrite 90.2
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 15.1
79% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 32.4
75% 152 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 100%
ST6000VX 0023-2EF110 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 36 37 22 26 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 13.7
Write 16.7
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 32.5
28% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.2
72% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 15%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GIS Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 19.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.2
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M4640G Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M4640G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback