Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '17 at 21:03
Run Duration394 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 254
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 691
72% 578 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4771
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.81% Terrible
Lighting 8.13
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 7.91
7% 9.24 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 7.47
Splatting 16.6
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
EVGA(3842 6573) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.69
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 103
Reflection 115
Parallax 94.2
84% 104 fps
Gravity 88.3
Splatting 101
85% 94.5 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB
465GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,126
Write 1,388
Mixed 1,180
345% 1,565 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 35
188% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 497
DQ Write 411
DQ Mixed 207
223% 372 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 245%
Great: 276%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 402
Mixed 411
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 33.6
149% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 45.8
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 109
99% 144 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 115
Write 112
Mixed 108
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.28
111% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
573GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 103
Mixed 109
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.26
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.26
123% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 109%
WD WD3200BMVS-11F9S0 3TB
247GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.7% Above average
Read 131
Write 57
Mixed 67.6
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 0.27
60% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
177GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 72.3
Write 68.7
Mixed 67.8
52% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.2
95% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
97GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 148
Mixed 132
124% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.22
87% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
702GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 75.3
Write 78.9
Mixed 64.7
94% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.23
62% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33%
Great: 62%
WD My Book 1235 3TB
560GB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 108
Write 96.6
Mixed 81.1
119% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.25
92% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
208GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 55.9
Write 58.4
Mixed 58.6
75% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.19
59% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 61%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
140GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 88.2
Write 91
Mixed 88.7
116% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 4.25
4K Mixed 0.62
169% 1.94 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 22.8
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback