Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170426
Uptime4 Days
Run DateSep 22 '17 at 20:10
Run Duration393 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 691
72% 580 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4771
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.77% Terrible
Lighting 8.07
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 7.72
7% 9.12 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 16.5
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
EVGA(3842 6573) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 100
Reflection 112
Parallax 94.1
82% 102 fps
Gravity 92
Splatting 98.3
85% 95.2 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB
465GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,122
Write 1,371
Mixed 1,203
346% 1,565 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 27.6
182% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 409
DQ Mixed 191
217% 371 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 241%
Great: 276%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 402
Mixed 413
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 35.1
158% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 127
148% 256 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 89.9
Write 77.8
Mixed 85.5
64% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.22
76% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
573GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 97.9
Mixed 104
75% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.31
101% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 109%
WD WD3200BMVS-11F9S0 3TB
248GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.4% Above average
Read 122
Write 60.6
Mixed 67.8
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.25
54% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
177GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 71.9
Write 68.3
Mixed 73.7
54% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.27
91% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
97GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 145
Mixed 133
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.26
95% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
702GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 74.3
Write 79.7
Mixed 64.1
94% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.24
70% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 62%
WD My Book 1235 3TB
560GB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 105
Write 94.5
Mixed 90.1
122% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.27
95% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
208GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 60.5
Write 59.4
Mixed 59.2
77% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 61%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
140GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 89.7
Write 88.4
Mixed 89.6
115% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 4.53
4K Mixed 0.57
177% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.8% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 22.8
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 22.5
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback