Asus Q505UAR

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus Q505UAR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q505UAR
Memory	9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '22 at 23:22
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 102 2-Core 190 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 559 57% 461 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 2958) CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Lighting 35.4 Reflection 37.5 Parallax 31.9 29% 34.9 fps	MRender 34.2 Gravity 34.3 Splatting 30 27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD 16,267 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 252GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 338 150 94 92 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 392 Write 302 Mixed 280 SusWrite 179 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 37 139% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 199 173% 255 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 96%
PNY USB 3.0 to SATA-¢ó 256GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 186GB free Firmware: 0209 SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 308 321 309 298 292 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 320 Write 299 Mixed 257 SusWrite 308 67% 296 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 38.2 4K Mixed 14.3 62% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 35 55% 103 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 20.9 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 22 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q505UAR Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus Q505UAR

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	104x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	99x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	3x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	11x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	5x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	5x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GBMicronBench 55%, 309 samples	49x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GBMicronBench 53%, 137 samples	32x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 2,683 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16