Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 22:43
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 471
63% 471 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 19.2
16% 19.1 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 0
9% 12 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 103 39 15 5.2 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 449
Write 382
Mixed 324
SusWrite 64
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 16.3
78% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 34
39% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
919GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 181 184 184 182 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 227
Write 163
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 179
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
258% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 117%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G30C15U4R.M8FE1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback