TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro N50-600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-600
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191030
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 21:49
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 947
90% 745 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 95%
 Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Sapphire(174B A538) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.1% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 88.9
79% 94.1 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 88.1
Splatting 76.9
71% 88.4 fps
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 76.1%
 Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 198 198 192 183 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 998
Write 214
Mixed 341
SusWrite 186
95% 435 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 39.1
158% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 492
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 283
228% 330 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 115%
 Great: 153%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
261GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 134 133 132 131 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 156
Write 153
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 127
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 81.2%
 Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.C8FJ 859B CT8G4DFS8266.C8FJ 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.7% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 72.7%
 Great: 73%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro N50-600 Builds (Compare 4,465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro N50-600

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel  $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples1,922x
Core i5-8400Intel  $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples1,332x
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples427x
GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples894x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia  $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples554x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples534x
SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples673x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples246x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples233x
RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,517 samples340x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples318x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 44%, 10,608 samples201x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback