Intel DP35DP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemINTEL_ DP35DP__
MotherboardIntel DP35DP  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090107
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 12:37
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$100
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 84.7
44% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 165
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 50 28 26 26 21 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 189
Write 138
Mixed 121
SusWrite 42.9
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 27.4
94% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 65
DQ Mixed 31.5
29% 43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 88%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
56GB free
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 112 107 107 29 12 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.7% Average
Read 230
Write 208
Mixed 151
SusWrite 78.4
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 24.8
98% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 28.4
25% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 88%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 51 28 27 26 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 162
Write 149
Mixed 71
SusWrite 43.8
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 1
22% 7.5 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 0.4
2% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
954GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 112 107 107 29 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 111
Write 86.2
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 78.4
65% 88 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.6% Poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DP35DP Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DP35DP - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback