Intel DP35DP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemINTEL_ DP35DP__
MotherboardIntel DP35DP  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090107
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 12:23
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$100
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 31
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 85.4
30% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 170
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 6.7
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 23 20 33 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.5% Below average
Read 158
Write 132
Mixed 114
SusWrite 34.6
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 24.9
83% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.1
DQ Write 65
DQ Mixed 31.1
29% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 88%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
56GB free
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 105 36 17 19 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.6% Average
Read 218
Write 208
Mixed 73
SusWrite 63
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 21.9
86% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 43.3
DQ Mixed 24.6
22% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 88%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 62 27 21 34 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 138
Write 62.3
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 38.1
17% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 0.9
11% 5.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 0.6
2% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
954GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 105 35 16 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 63
68% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DP35DP Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DP35DP - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback