MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7976
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 20:34
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 43.7
1-Core 19.1
2-Core 42.2
24% 35 Pts
4-Core 83.1
8-Core 132
13% 108 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 162 92 83 89 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 407
Write 393
Mixed 324
SusWrite 143
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 26.6
90% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 121
116% 184 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
192GB free
Firmware: 3E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 101 100 101 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 85.3
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 99.4
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54%
Great: 58%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
371GB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 52.2
Write 48.9
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 93.4
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 67%
USB Disk 3.0 64GB
28GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 31 23 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 98.3
Write 59.7
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 29.9
57% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.6
106% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 20.8
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) Builds (Compare 2,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $770
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback