Lenovo 4354CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4354CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory116.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 08:16
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 159
52% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 651
57% 485 Pts
64-Core 2,245
139% 2,245 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.6% Good
Lighting 77.2
Reflection 79.2
Parallax 72.5
63% 76.3 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 76.3
Splatting 71.7
59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 314 386 221 280 211 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 404
Write 366
Mixed 387
SusWrite 275
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 36.4
94% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 322
225% 280 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 133%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 23TB
21TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.2 3.3 3.4 2.6 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.84% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 3
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 3
4% 5.22 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 3.84%
Great: 285%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 70.2
MC Write 53.9
MC Mixed 58.8
174% 61 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.9
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 142%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4354CTO Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Lenovo 4354CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback