Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 378 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Memory 44.9 1-Core 66.4 2-Core 155 48% 88.9 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 618 54% 460 Pts	64-Core 2,300 142% 2,300 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Lighting 39 Reflection 35.5 Parallax 45.3 32% 40 fps	MRender 48.7 Gravity 45.3 Splatting 36.6 35% 43.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 31%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 73 88 50 108 97 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.2% Poor	Read 150 Write 79.4 Mixed 123 SusWrite 79.2 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 7.8 23% 7.33 MB/s	DQ Read 78 DQ Write 60.4 DQ Mixed 14.6 26% 51 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 8x16GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	66.6% Good	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 23.1 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 4.6 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 138%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2651 v21stBench 49%, 81 samples	24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2689 01stBench 66%, 461 samples	24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v21stBench 62%, 190 samples	22x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $95Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	26x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	9x
GP-GSM2NE3100TNTD 1TBGigabyteBench 201%, 8,556 samples	6x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	8x
HMT42GR7AFR4C 4x16GBHynixBench 81%, 60 samples	4x
M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70QB0- M393B1K70QB0- 32GBSamsungBench 99%, 21 samples	4x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $225