VXL Itona LQ Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVXL Itona LQ Series  (all builds)
MotherboardVXL MZE12
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151020
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 11:46
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Memory 35.1
1-Core 21.9
2-Core 44.5
22% 33.8 Pts
4-Core 89.4
8-Core 87.8
12% 88.6 Pts
64-Core 90.4
6% 90.4 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.51% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 2.3
1% 2.4 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.51%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
32gb SATA Flash Drive 30GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SFDK003A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 61 60 45 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.1% Poor
Read 210
Write 64.4
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 52.2
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 5.4
36% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 39.2
DQ Write 60.7
DQ Mixed 16.9
22% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.B2GCN.4000C 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.4
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 226
18% 226 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Itona LQ Series Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: VXL Itona LQ Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback