Positivo VJFE52F11X-XXXXXX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemPositivo VJFE52F11X-XXXXXX  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-CL
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 04:37
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 246
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 553
62% 485 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 7.8
5% 6.73 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.1
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0318B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 878 1027 991 228 115 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,466
Write 790
Mixed 696
SusWrite 567
195% 879 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 23.6
209% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 809
DQ Mixed 463
440% 684 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 188%
Great: 151%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
921GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 139 140 139 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 117
Write 117
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 137
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD24D4S7S8K1A-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJFE52F11X-XXXXXX Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE52F11X-XXXXXX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback