Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-V  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 21:56
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 178
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 355
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 119 136 127 142 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 147
Write 151
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 133
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 114%
Hitachi DKR2D-H3R0SS 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: FEFE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 130 121 110 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 152
Write 140
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 125
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 87%
Hitachi DKR2D-H3R0SS 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: FEFE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 146 108 145 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 133
Write 135
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 140
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 87%
Hitachi DKR2D-H3R0SS 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: FEFE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 41 46 37 24 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 149
Write 120
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 37.5
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 87%
Hitachi DKR2D-H3R0SS 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: FEFE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 146 139 136 123 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 117
Write 137
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 140
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 87%
Hitachi DKR2D-H3R0SS 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: FEFE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 143 123 119 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 148
Write 127
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 133
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 87%
Hitachi DKR2D-H3R0SS 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: FEFE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 148 132 119 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 144
Write 131
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 140
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 87%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
12.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 41 46 36 24 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 160
Write 134
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 37
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 105%
KIOXIA TransMemory 16GB
9GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.8 4.4 4.5 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
6.86% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 7.4
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 3.8
15% 14 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
30% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback