LG 14Z90N-V.BJ51P2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLG 14Z90N-V.BJ51P2  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 14Z90N
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 20:08
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 224
70% 131 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 432
51% 393 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Device(1854 0365) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9836
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
8.56% Terrible
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 16.2
13% 12.6 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA5-8D256 256GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ21901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 220 241 215 225 444 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,482
Write 945
Mixed 1,028
SusWrite 277
207% 933 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 38.2
188% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 886
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 765
548% 712 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 162%
Great: 232%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
86GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 66 66 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 48.8
Write 82.5
Mixed 82
SusWrite 65.7
52% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.4
117% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 14Z90N-V.BJ51P2 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: LG 14Z90N-V.BJ51P2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback