Asus X79-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X79-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160202
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 19:19
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 181
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 586
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 743
46% 743 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Black-$1,000
Asus(1043 84B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 81.3
46% 67.5 fps
MRender 80.4
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 59.2
56% 70.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 132 123 128 129 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 333
Write 265
Mixed 272
SusWrite 134
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 27.5
93% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 279
200% 256 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 94%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
65GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 88 87 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 44.7
Write 25
Mixed 41.6
SusWrite 87.9
37% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 77%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55
115GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 75 75 73 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 70.6
Write 44.7
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 74.1
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 42%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
94GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 133 133 133 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 129
Write 121
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 133
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
55GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 57 56 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 68.9
Write 68.8
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 57
79% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 63%
Corsair Force 3 SSD 120GB
5GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 52 41 48 57 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.4% Excellent
Read 61.6
Write 70.5
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 50
91% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 18.9
1,381% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 28.2
DQ Mixed 17.4
1,618% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/8GX KHX2400C11D3/8GX GKH400UD25608-160 GKH400UD25608-160 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.3% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.2
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-DELUXE Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X79-DELUXE - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback