Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 13:23
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 125
59% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 288
32% 254 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
XFX(1682 2286) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.6
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 83 88 92 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 158
Write 151
Mixed 160
SusWrite 87.5
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 29.3
104% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 41.7
39% 58 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
12GB free
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 88 91 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 96
Write 91.7
Mixed 63
SusWrite 90.7
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 13
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback