Seneca PRO587430

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSeneca PRO587430  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z97-K
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 22:30
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 226
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 616
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 2962) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 47.4
Parallax 41.6
35% 43.8 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 36.6
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Axiom C560 Series SSD 1TB
884GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1003B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 295 325 326 329 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 463
Write 318
Mixed 295
SusWrite 301
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 26
96% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 213
171% 238 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBH2X04E99927-15 0118 8GBH2X04E99927-15 M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.3% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO587430 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Seneca PRO587430

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback