HP 850-065se

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 850-065se  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B3A
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150902
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 10:02
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 81%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$599
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 197
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 652
66% 534 Pts
64-Core 837
52% 837 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.2% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 139
Parallax 202
99% 154 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 125
Splatting 89.9
87% 109 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 4TB-$470
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 220 216 225 223 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 453
Write 417
Mixed 390
SusWrite 222
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 34.7
140% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 232
174% 236 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 133%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
825GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 688 674 640 704 707 708 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 746
Write 882
Mixed 590
SusWrite 687
164% 726 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 29.2
111% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 77.1
DQ Write 457
DQ Mixed 642
384% 392 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 118%
Great: 310%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
381GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 128 129 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
67% Good
Read 105
Write 114
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 127
68% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.6
231% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 67%
Great: 87%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 145 150 141 148 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 157
Write 148
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 145
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
256% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 123 133 133 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 113
Write 132
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 128
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 37.8
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 850-065se Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP 850-065se

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback