HP 850-065se

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 850-065se  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B3A
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150902
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 04:39
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$599
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 192
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 622
63% 511 Pts
64-Core 816
50% 816 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.9% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 142
Parallax 203
101% 156 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 132
Splatting 94.9
92% 115 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 4TB-$470
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 230 232 225 227 231 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 460
Write 432
Mixed 381
SusWrite 229
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 36.7
121% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 230
174% 237 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 81%
Great: 133%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
923GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 687 642 645 658 665 674 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 740
Write 906
Mixed 737
SusWrite 662
172% 761 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 49.7
161% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 633
467% 617 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 147%
Great: 310%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 140 140 140 141 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 147
Write 101
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 135
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
222% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 87%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 151 141 149 149 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 144
Write 143
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 146
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
272% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 125 128 133 132 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 130
Write 104
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 127
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 39.6
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 21
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 850-065se Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP 850-065se

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback