HP 700-567nz

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory22GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 700-567nz  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B36
Memory19 GB free of 22 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 04:01
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 216
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 610
62% 500 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1570 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 48.6
Parallax 43.3
39% 46.5 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 37.8
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 324 315 303 306 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 424
Mixed 416
SusWrite 315
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 39.1
138% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 343
263% 356 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 128%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EZBX-75A 2TB
979GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 199 196 197 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 191
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 197
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 1.1
474% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 114%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C11 Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G6E1 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C11 22GB
1333, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-567nz Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP 700-567nz

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback